Septic History Limits the Outcome of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis

Abstract

Joint destruction necessitates tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) in cases of clinical deficits that cannot be controlled conservatively, possibly leading to sepsis. We aimed to compare the underlying etiology of posttraumatic joint destruction and the outcomes after TTCA in patients with a septic or aseptic history. Between 2010 and 2022, 216 patients with TTCA were retrospectively enrolled (septic TTCA (S-TTCA) = 129; aseptic TTCA (A-TTCA) = 87). Patient demographics, etiology, Olerud and Molander Ankle Scores (OMASs), Foot Function Index (FFI-D) scores, and Short Form-12 Questionnaire (SF-12) scores were recorded. The mean follow-up period was 6.5 years. Tibial plafond and ankle fractures were the most common causes of sepsis. The mean OMAS was 43.0; the mean FFI-D was 76.7; and the mean SF-12 physical component summary score was 35.5. All the scores differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.001). With an average of 11 operations until the arthrodesis was achieved, the S-TTCA patients underwent about three times as many operations as the A-TTCA patients (p < 0.001), and 41% of S-TTCA patients remained permanently unable to work (p < 0.001). The significantly worse results of S-TTCA compared to A-TTCA show the long and stressful ordeal that patients with a septic history suffer. Further attention must be paid to infection prophylaxis and, if necessary, early infection revision.

Spanish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) for Ankle Fractures

“… 16 , 23 For this reason, it is often used to measure the subjective perception of function in this group of patients. 1 , 10 , 13 , 17 , 19 , 31 …”

“…16,23 For this reason, it is often used to measure the subjective perception of function in this group of patients. 1,10,13,17,19,31 The aim of this study is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the OMAS into Spanish. Additionally, it is intended to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Spanish OMAS version (OMAS-Sp) in comparison with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).…”