2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.08.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Septal vs. Apical Pacing: A Matter of Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Septal stimulation represents a simple alternative, with no extra cost and potential advantages over other sites, since the QRS complex obtained in this position is more physiologically normal in relation to electrical axis and length [31][32][33][34] . Nonetheless, most studies involve a small patient sample with no randomization and the criteria used to define the stimulation site can result in the evaluation of heterogeneous groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Septal stimulation represents a simple alternative, with no extra cost and potential advantages over other sites, since the QRS complex obtained in this position is more physiologically normal in relation to electrical axis and length [31][32][33][34] . Nonetheless, most studies involve a small patient sample with no randomization and the criteria used to define the stimulation site can result in the evaluation of heterogeneous groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%