1969
DOI: 10.3758/bf03331884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Septal lesions enhance delay of responding on a free operant avoidance schedule

Abstract: Rats with bilateral lesions o[ the septal nuc/ei demonstrated superior response inhibition relative to controls on a [ree oper an t avoidance task. They received [ewer shocks but exhibited a lower response rate and thus longer pauses between responses. These jindings are not consistent with the notion that septaliesions result in an inability to withhold responding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this type of interpretation seems unsatisfactory since rats with septal lesions do suppress responding: (1) on a DRL schedule when an exteroceptive cue is provided signaling the end of the delay period (Ellen & Butter, 1969); (2) when a particular class of interresponse times is differentially reinforced (Ellen, Makohon, & Richardson, 1978); and (3) on a Sidman avoidance task (Morgan & Mitchell, 1969;Sodetz, 1970). The present study demonstrates that VMH rats do not seem to have an inability to suppress responding, and, unlike septal rats, they do appear to be able to use internal cues to perform proficiently on this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this type of interpretation seems unsatisfactory since rats with septal lesions do suppress responding: (1) on a DRL schedule when an exteroceptive cue is provided signaling the end of the delay period (Ellen & Butter, 1969); (2) when a particular class of interresponse times is differentially reinforced (Ellen, Makohon, & Richardson, 1978); and (3) on a Sidman avoidance task (Morgan & Mitchell, 1969;Sodetz, 1970). The present study demonstrates that VMH rats do not seem to have an inability to suppress responding, and, unlike septal rats, they do appear to be able to use internal cues to perform proficiently on this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a decrement in shock intensity reduces the response output and increases the shock rate for normal animals (powell, 1970;Riess, 1970;Riess & Ferrar, 1972), it is difficult to reconcile these effects with fear reduction. An explanation in terms of response disinhibition fares no better as the increased efficiency of the brain-damaged rats appears to be at least partially due to the fact that they can space their responses more appropriately (Morgan & Mitchell, 1969;Sodetz, 1970Sodetz, , 1972. More detailed study of the patterns of responding on free-operant avoidance tasks following septal lesions seems necessary .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second purpose of the experiment was to make a detailed study of free-operant avoidance behavior following septal damage. Septal lesions in rats have been found to decrease both response (Morgan & Mitchell, 1969;Sodetz, 1970Sodetz, , 1972 and shock rates (Morgan & Mitchell, 1969;Sodetz, 1970;Duncan & Duncan, 1971) on leverpress free-operant avoidance. This increased effiCiency presents difficulties for both hypotheses under consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Van Hoesen, MacDougall, and Mitchell (1972) have shown that animals with septal lesions are more efficient than normal animals on a two-bar ratio schedule where a high response output is required . Morgan and Mitchell (1969) and Sodetz (1970) have shown that rats with septal lesions are superior to normal animals when performing on a Sidman avoidance schedule. Since performance on these tasks presumably requires the use of responseproduced cues, such findings are inconsistent with the notion that septal damage leads to a deficit in the use of response-produced cues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%