2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Septa within the sinus: effect on elevation of the sinus floor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bruno et al confirmed that 40% of patients have bony septa that can partially separate the maxillary sinus [37]. In our study, 98% of the dentate patients and 96% of the edentate patients presented with complete septa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Bruno et al confirmed that 40% of patients have bony septa that can partially separate the maxillary sinus [37]. In our study, 98% of the dentate patients and 96% of the edentate patients presented with complete septa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Previous in vitro experiments of Jank et al (14) have shown that the intralift method would reduce the incidence of sinus membrane rupture after a single puncture of the membrane with a 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 conventional sinus lift procedure and could also be used when large bone septa are located in the sinus floor (26). This crestal approach for large sinus lift has already been described using press-fit bone cylinders (27) or osteotomes technique (28) and they allow reducing morbidity of the procedures …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common morphological variations was described by Underwood as sinus septa (Underwood, 1909). Septa prevalence should be considered on each occasion prior to sinus lift surgery, as its presence may lead to perforation or tearing of the Schneiderian membrane or a reduction in the capability of augmentation steps and may force the surgeon to enlarge the operation to an extent that it may result in a decrease in treatment success rate (Underwood, 1909;van den Bergh et al, 2000;Chanavaz, 1990;ten Bruggenkate et al, 1998;Ulm et al, 1995;Ella et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%