Abstract:The immune response of the host against invading pathogens is clinically manifested as sepsis.Sepsis is a complicated process characterized by distinct phases that usually occur in a sequential manner. The initial hyper-inflammation helps in elimination of the pathogen, but potentially may lead to excessive tissue injury. Hypo-inflammation helps in restoring immune homeostasis, but may lead to significant immune suppression and death from secondary infections if not appropriately controlled. Immune-modulating intervention in sepsis should be based on a balanced control of both the hyper and the hypo-inflammatory phase. repeated cycles of hyper and hypo-inflammatory phases further complicating the septic process. Additional evidence for the sepsis-associated immunosuppression is the high incidence of herpes virus reactivation that occurs in patients with prolonged septic episodes (5). These clinical observations are supported from in vitro data showing impaired cytotoxicity and increased apoptosis of immune effectors from septic patients (6).
Trials targeting the hyper-inflammatory phase of sepsisInterleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) is a plasma protein that inhibits both IL-1a and IL-1b after binding to the type 1 IL-1 receptor (7). Anakinra is a recombinant human IL-1Ra. The efficacy of Anakinra as an immunemodulator in patients with sepsis was compared with placebo in a double blind phase III trial. In this trial anakinra failed to prolong 28-day survival, but in a subgroup analysis survival was improved in patients with septic shock or MOD in the arm of anakinra (8). Based on these data a phase III trial testing the efficacy of anakinra in patients with septic shock and/or severe sepsis was conducted, and again failed to show any survival benefit (9). However, in a subgroup analysis IL-1 inhibition improved survival in patients with severe sepsis and features of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) (10). The beneficial efficacy of anakinra in this group of patients should be clarified in a prospective randomized trial.Most of the clinical trials conducted in the past were based on the notion that sepsis mortality was mainly due to an uncontrolled inflammatory response, and therefore were focused on testing the effect of blocking the hyperinflammatory phase by using various agents including corticosteroids, and anti-endotoxin or anti-cytokine antibodies. These studies failed to show therapeutic benefit, and moreover in many cases excessive anti-inflammatory inhibition had a negative impact on the outcome of septic patients (11-13).
Reasons for failure of agents targeting the hyper-inflammatory phaseFailure of pro-inflammatory cytokine inhibition to improve the outcome of septic patients might be attributed to several reasons:(I) Inhibition of the hyper-inflammatory phase needs to occur at the right time. Anti-inflammatory blockade should occur at the very beginning of the septic process and not at later stages where patients are already in a state of immune-suppression. Previous trials included p...