2001
DOI: 10.1021/cr990091m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separations Combined with Mass Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 324 publications
(530 reference statements)
0
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate the utility of the AMT tag approach using capillary LC-TOF MS instruments, and also show that AMT tags developed using other instrumentation can be effectively utilized. T he two dominant separation methods used in proteomics are 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis [1] and, increasingly, liquid chromatography (LC) [2]. The first use of LC to obtain sequence information from proteins was by Fredrick Sanger in the 1940s and LC separation methods have experienced rapidly growing use since online LC-MS analysis based upon electrospray ionization (ESI) was demonstrated in the early 1990s [3][4][5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results demonstrate the utility of the AMT tag approach using capillary LC-TOF MS instruments, and also show that AMT tags developed using other instrumentation can be effectively utilized. T he two dominant separation methods used in proteomics are 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis [1] and, increasingly, liquid chromatography (LC) [2]. The first use of LC to obtain sequence information from proteins was by Fredrick Sanger in the 1940s and LC separation methods have experienced rapidly growing use since online LC-MS analysis based upon electrospray ionization (ESI) was demonstrated in the early 1990s [3][4][5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, three major difficulties have limited the coupling of LC to MS for many years, namely I) apparent incompatibility of the flow-rate as expressed by the need for introducing a large volume of a liquid effluent from a conventional LC column into the high vacuum of the mass spectrometer; II) incompatibility of the effluent composition as a result of the frequent use of non-volatile mobile phase additives during the LC separation process, and (III) ionization of non-volatile and/or thermally labile analytes (Niessen & Tinke, 1995). These difficulties were overcome with the advent of the atmospheric pressure ionization (API) techniques, more specifically electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) (Tomer, 2001). In ESI, the sample is dissolved in a polar, volatile solvent and pumped through a narrow stainless steel capillary (75-150 m i. d.).…”
Section: Why Use Lc-ms?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass spectrometry lacks intrinsic chemical selectivity, except for formula-specific identification by sufficiently high mass resolution (63,64), and differing drift velocities in ion mobility spectrometry. However, instruments in all of the areas named above have been interfaced to liquid chromatography, GC, and CE separations (67).…”
Section: Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%