Biophysico‐Chemical Processes Involving Natural Nonliving Organic Matter in Environmental Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470494950.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation Technology as a Powerful Tool for Unfolding Molecular Complexity of Natural Organic Matter and Humic Substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore sizes of OmpF and OmpC are 1.2 nm and 1.1 nm, respectively, and other porins can be 1.2 to 2.5 nm in diameter (29,41). Reported values for HS, in turn, vary from 1.5 to 5.8 nm (40). The latter value is evidence of the opportunity of HS (or at least their low-molecular-weight fractions) to penetrate the E. coli outer membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The pore sizes of OmpF and OmpC are 1.2 nm and 1.1 nm, respectively, and other porins can be 1.2 to 2.5 nm in diameter (29,41). Reported values for HS, in turn, vary from 1.5 to 5.8 nm (40). The latter value is evidence of the opportunity of HS (or at least their low-molecular-weight fractions) to penetrate the E. coli outer membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, molecular structures of NOM remain largely unknown. This is because the extreme complexity of NOM renders impossible their separation into individual compounds by conventional techniques such as liquid chromatography, electrophoresis, or isoelectric focusing . The same is true for structural studies of NOM by powerful physical methods that work perfectly for monomolecular samples (e.g., NMR spectroscopy, soft X-ray spectroscopy, fluorescence polarization) but are not capable of revealing the individual structures of NOM despite many efforts. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though significant research has been conducted over the past several decades to characterize the properties and reactivity of humic substances, there is still a lack of consensus as to the nature of these complex materials (Hayes and Clapp 2001;Perminova et al 2009). Researchers generally agree that much of the reactivity of humic and fulvic acids is due in large part to the presence of carboxylic (-COOH) and phenolic (C 6 H 5 OH) groups (Steinburg 2003).…”
Section: Figure 3-4 Formation Of Natural Organic Matter (Adapted Fromentioning
confidence: 99%