The sudden appearance of Akera bullata in the static water tanks of H.M. Dockyard, Devonport, provided specimens for the investigation of pigments. Morton & Holme (1955) have given an account of certain aspects of the biology of this interesting tectibranch mollusc.Fifteen fresh specimens were minced in the Waring blender, and the resulting material was treated in the following ways.
Method IA portion of the minced material was extracted with absolute methanol, and the extract filtered. The green solution was intensely red-fluorescent in ultra-violet light, and was submitted to long-paper chromatography (Kennedy, 1953). The solvent phases were 2:6-lutidine (5 parts) and water (3 parts), and the chromatograms were run at 23°C in an atmosphere of ammonia.When the chromatograms were viewed by ultra-violet light, they revealed a spot, red-fluorescent, with RF value 0.95, indicating a monocarboxyl porphyrin compound such as phaeophorbide. There was another spot with RF value 1.0 (i.e. travelling with the solvent), which was red, and had a blue fluorescence. This was most probably carotenoid with fat.The main purpose of this preliminary experiment was to determine the presence or absence of unchanged chlorophyll in the animal. The fact that no red-fluorescent spot with an RF value 1.0 was found, indicated the absence of this pigment.Method 2 A portion was extracted with a mixture of methanol and concentrated sulphuric acid (19: I) and allowed to stand overnight in the ice-chest. It was then diluted with an equal volume of water, and the pigmented material was extracted with Analar chloroform, giving an extract which was intensely fluorescent when viewed in ultra-violet light. This extract was roughly dried by passing it through chloroform-soaked paper, and evaporated to dryness in vacuo. The residue was redissolved in dried Analar chloroform, and chromatographed on magnesium oxide grade III (Nicholas, 1951). A deep , ,-2