2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of protease from yellowfin tuna spleen extract by ultrafiltration: Effect of hydrodynamics and gas sparging on flux enhancement and selectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The R if of 0.1 lm membrane was the lowest value. The R if of 0.2 lm membrane was the highest but it can be reduced by modifying hydrodynamic operation such as gas sparging (Li et al, 2008). As mention above, not only the best recovery of phytochemical properties i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Membrane Pore Size and Mwcomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The R if of 0.1 lm membrane was the lowest value. The R if of 0.2 lm membrane was the highest but it can be reduced by modifying hydrodynamic operation such as gas sparging (Li et al, 2008). As mention above, not only the best recovery of phytochemical properties i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Membrane Pore Size and Mwcomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, membrane filtration is a technology which could further increase both concentration and purification of these enzymes easily. The proteases in yellowfin tuna spleen could be isolated and partially purified by ultrafiltration (Li, Youravong, & H-Kittikun, 2006;Li, H-Kittikun, & Youravong, 2008a). Therefore, the aim of the present work was to study the hydrolysis of casein and soybean protein isolate by the protease separated from yellowfin tuna spleen by membrane filtration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The backflow techniques help lengthen the filtration time before the permeate flux decreases to an unaccepted level and as such they reduce the frequency of chemical washings. Use of dynamic membranes [19] or application of external forces like electric field and ultrasound, application of Gas/air sparging [20] are other techniques for enhancement of membrane separation performance. The use of spacers (in organic polymeric membranes) and turbulence promoters (in tubular ceramic membranes to create turbulent flow at the surface of the membrane or to increase shear) also prove their efficiency in improvement of membrane separation performance in many cases [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%