2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320962111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of on-target efficacy from adverse effects through rational design of a bitopic adenosine receptor agonist

Abstract: The concepts of allosteric modulation and biased agonism are revolutionizing modern approaches to drug discovery, particularly in the field of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Both phenomena exploit topographically distinct binding sites to promote unique GPCR conformations that can lead to different patterns of cellular responsiveness. The adenosine A 1 GPCR (A 1 AR) is a major therapeutic target for cardioprotection, but current agents acting on the receptor are clinically limited for this indication bec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
145
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 1 AR-biased agonism has been previously investigated (Langemeijer et al, 2013;Valant et al, 2014;Baltos et al, 2016) and recently demonstrated to allow for the selective stimulation of cardioprotective signal transduction in the absence of the adverse hemodynamic effects commonly associated with A 1 AR therapies (Valant et al, 2014). The current study has identified a range of bias profiles for subtype selective A 3 AR agonists, which offer a potential therapeutic advantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A 1 AR-biased agonism has been previously investigated (Langemeijer et al, 2013;Valant et al, 2014;Baltos et al, 2016) and recently demonstrated to allow for the selective stimulation of cardioprotective signal transduction in the absence of the adverse hemodynamic effects commonly associated with A 1 AR therapies (Valant et al, 2014). The current study has identified a range of bias profiles for subtype selective A 3 AR agonists, which offer a potential therapeutic advantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…exploitation of "bitopic" or "dualsteric" ligands, namely, hybrid bifunctional molecules that are composed of two pharmacophores, each known to independently interact with an orthosteric and allosteric site (Disingrini et al, 2006;Steinfeld et al, 2007;Valant et al, 2008Valant et al, , 2009Valant et al, , 2012cValant et al, , 2014Antony et al, 2009;Mohr et al, 2010Mohr et al, , 2013Narlawar et al, 2010;Bock et al, 2012;Lane et al, 2013). Some examples of rationally designed bitopic ligands are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Advances In Gpcr Allosterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form of selectivity is also particularly pertinent to situations where pure allosteric modulators may lose effectiveness, such as in the context of neurodegenerative disease where endogenous tone is progressively lost while the receptor target remains functional. Another major advantage of bitopic ligands is the potential to engender biased agonism (Antony et al, 2009;Kebig et al, 2009;Valant et al, 2014) because concomitant binding to two different sites may promote unique receptor conformations. A recent successful example of this approach is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Advances In Gpcr Allosterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now accepted that chemically distinct ligands binding to the same G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) can stabilize the receptor in multiple active conformations, which results in differential activation of cell signaling pathways and, eventually, in different physiologic outcomes, a phenomenon known as biased agonism (Kenakin et al, 2012). Biased agonism can be exploited to design drugs that selectively activate signaling pathways, leading to the desired physiologic effects while minimizing on-target side effects elicited by activation of other signaling pathways via the same receptor subtype (Gesty-Palmer et al, 2009;Walters et al, 2009;Valant et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%