Ultrafiltration Membranes and Applications 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3162-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of Macromolecules by Ultrafiltration: Influence of Protein Adsorption, Protein-Protein Interactions, and Concentration Polarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sieving coefficient trends for lysozyme in the presence of BSA as a function of pH, as well as ionic strength, agree with previous diafiltration (Ingham et al, 1980) and deadend ultrafiltration (Iritani et al, 1997) experiments. It was reported that the sieving coefficient at neutral pH increased as a function of ionic strength, in agreement with our results.…”
Section: Comparison Of Lysozyme Sieving Behavior With Previous Worksupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The sieving coefficient trends for lysozyme in the presence of BSA as a function of pH, as well as ionic strength, agree with previous diafiltration (Ingham et al, 1980) and deadend ultrafiltration (Iritani et al, 1997) experiments. It was reported that the sieving coefficient at neutral pH increased as a function of ionic strength, in agreement with our results.…”
Section: Comparison Of Lysozyme Sieving Behavior With Previous Worksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In diafiltration, the lysozyme concentration in the stirred cell (c) as a function of time, which was calculated from the concentration of lysozyme in the filtrate samples by difference, can be described by (Ingham et al, 1980) …”
Section: Sieving Coefficient Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations