2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2003.08.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of isomers by dimer formation: isomerically pure benzene+ and toluene+ ions, and their dimers: ab initio calculations on (benzene)2+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sandwich isomers, the binding energies are ϳ20 kcal/ mol, in agreement with the experimental studies setting it in the 15-20 kcal/mol range. [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] The t-shaped isomer is ϳ7 kcal/ mol less strongly bound. Inclusion of triple excitations in the description of the cation has a small effect on the binding energies, lowering them to less than 0.5 kcal/mol.…”
Section: B Binding Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sandwich isomers, the binding energies are ϳ20 kcal/ mol, in agreement with the experimental studies setting it in the 15-20 kcal/mol range. [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] The t-shaped isomer is ϳ7 kcal/ mol less strongly bound. Inclusion of triple excitations in the description of the cation has a small effect on the binding energies, lowering them to less than 0.5 kcal/mol.…”
Section: B Binding Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Ground state binding energy ͑BE͒ in the gas phase has been measured to be in the range 15-20 kcal/ mol. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Several computational studies have investigated the ground state structures of the dimer cation. 41,[43][44][45][46][47] Milosevich et al 44 suggested a displaced sandwich structure based on Hartree-Fock calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density functional calculation predicts the ground state to have a sandwich structure. 43,47 The most exhaustive study to date is due to Miyoshi et al, 45,46 who characterized both ground and excited states of the dimer cation. In the earlier work, 45 they employed the complete active space self-consistent field ͑CASSCF͒ and multireference configuration interaction with singles and doubles ͑MR-CISD͒ methods to investigate the electronic structure of sandwich, displaced sandwich, and t-shaped isomers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several which is slightly less stable (about 2 kcal mol −1 ) than the two sandwich displaced isomers. DFT calculations [43][44][45] performed with the B3LYP functional give reasonable binding energies for the sandwhich structure (17-19 kcal mol −1 ) but underestimate the energy difference between the two structures due to an over-stabilization of the T-shaped structure. In the following, we will use the EOM-IP-CCSD 41,42 results as references to benchmark our method as they are the most recent ab initio calculations and the corresponding binding energies for the most stable structures around 20 kcal/mol (see Table 1 are in good agreement with the experimental studies providing values in the 15-20 kcal/mol range 44,[46][47][48][49][50][51] .…”
Section: Benzene Dimermentioning
confidence: 99%