2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of Intra- and Extramyocellular Lipid Signals in Proton MR Spectra by Determination of Their Magnetic Field Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BMS effect also accounts for the separate resonances from lipid in spherical droplets inside skeletal muscle and outside in elongated, more cylinder-like, adipocytes (2)(3)(4)8). In other words, the situation with DEP in a capillary (cylinder) and sphere assembly is an analog of muscle tissue in which there are lipid droplets inside myocytes and larger, more elongated, lipid bodies in adipocytes between the fibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The BMS effect also accounts for the separate resonances from lipid in spherical droplets inside skeletal muscle and outside in elongated, more cylinder-like, adipocytes (2)(3)(4)8). In other words, the situation with DEP in a capillary (cylinder) and sphere assembly is an analog of muscle tissue in which there are lipid droplets inside myocytes and larger, more elongated, lipid bodies in adipocytes between the fibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The correlation between the magnitude of the IMCL pool, as determined by MRS studies, and insulin resistance, diabetes, and disorders of lipid metabolism has been previously demonstrated (2,3,32,33). Nevertheless, quantification of IMCL and extramyocellular lipid (EMCL) by MRS remains highly problematic (32). The ability to distinguish IMCL from EMCL is based on their different bulk magnetic susceptibility effects due to their geometric arrangements within muscle, which leads to a spectroscopic frequency separation between the two pools; this separation is 0.15 ppm in the soleus and 0.2 ppm in the tibialis muscle and has been validated in vivo (33,34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The ability to distinguish IMCL from EMCL is based on their different bulk magnetic susceptibility effects due to their geometric arrangements within muscle, which leads to a spectroscopic frequency separation between the two pools; this separation is 0.15 ppm in the soleus and 0.2 ppm in the tibialis muscle and has been validated in vivo (33,34). At a clinical field strength of 1.5 T, these values are 9.6 and 12.8 Hz, respectively; at 3 T, the frequency separations are twofold greater (32). This permits the IMCL and EMCL signals to be individually identified in MRS but is not adequate for complete separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Steidle et al (116) suggested an alternative approach allowing the magnetic field distribution (MFD) to be obtained in the lipid containing compartments of a voxel (Fig. 10).…”
Section: Calibration By the Creatine Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%