2004
DOI: 10.1042/ba20030129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of immunoglobulin G precipitate from contaminating proteins using microfiltration

Abstract: A small-scale stirred-cell device was used to separate an antivenom antibody precipitate from a suspension containing contaminating soluble proteins. The device has a total volume of 200 ml and is equipped with a filter membrane with a cut-off size of 3 microm. About 90% of the antibody-precipitate particles in the feed were 29 microm or smaller, and the concentration of solids was 12% (w/w). The microfiltration cell was operated in a constant-volume (continuous/diafiltration) mode, and its performance was com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the S30 extract prepared under these heavily diluted conditions exhibited no loss of production efficiency, we attempted to use the TFF system to dialyze a large volume of S30 extract. In other words, the dialysis step for solvent exchange and removal of low-molecular chemicals was replaced with diafiltration (55,56). An ultrafiltration membrane (filtration area, 0.11 m 2 ; MWCO, 10 kDa) was applied to a TFF system, and the pump and valves were configured in a manner similar to that during cell harvesting, in fact, valves 2 and 3 were fully opened.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the S30 extract prepared under these heavily diluted conditions exhibited no loss of production efficiency, we attempted to use the TFF system to dialyze a large volume of S30 extract. In other words, the dialysis step for solvent exchange and removal of low-molecular chemicals was replaced with diafiltration (55,56). An ultrafiltration membrane (filtration area, 0.11 m 2 ; MWCO, 10 kDa) was applied to a TFF system, and the pump and valves were configured in a manner similar to that during cell harvesting, in fact, valves 2 and 3 were fully opened.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titre improvement Up to 19 One month to develop the Biacore assay; 6 months to write a validation protocol, undertake all the experiments and sign off the assay; 2 months to undertake trials on small sheep flocks and then scale up the immunisation protocol. Furthermore, based on an assumed 8% increase in titre per month, up to a maximum 80% rise, up to 10 further months would be needed Packed and expanded bed IgG capture 6 Purchasing, validating and qualifying the column and the subsequent ultrafilter as well as installing the associated instrumentation, process control equipment and electrical supply and then revalidating the remainder of the process downstream of where the centrifuge was originally Removing the ion exchange step 5 Development of the extra affinity wash step and revalidation of the affinity step and the steps downstream Fig.…”
Section: Tasks Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above method was applied to an industrial scale process operated by Protherics U.K. Limited (Blaenwaun, Ffostrasol, Llandysul, Wales, UK), which makes polyclonal F AB (CroFab TM ) for the treatment of rattlesnake envenomation [17][18][19]. A variety of changes are possible to boost annual product mass and reduce batch times and costs.…”
Section: Industrial Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companies have to bear significant risks of failure from competitive, regulatory, economic and clinical factors (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Against this backdrop, a number of techniques now exist that will serve to accelerate and enhance R&D, including genomics and high throughput screening (8) and the application of scale-down methodologies (9)(10)(11)(12). Computer simulations have demonstrated a similar potential, enabling rapid and inexpensive exploration of different process options (13) and facilitating comparison of alternatives (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%