2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.12.012
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of excitation and detection coils for in vivo detection of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (NPs), such as magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and maghemite (γ-Fe 2 O 3 ), have been found and applied in a wide range of biomedical applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], including magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic hyperthermia, cancer therapy, and drug delivery; they also find applications in catalysis [10,11,12] and in magnetic separation [13,14]. Among other metal nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles have been more extensively studied in clinical practice [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (NPs), such as magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and maghemite (γ-Fe 2 O 3 ), have been found and applied in a wide range of biomedical applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], including magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic hyperthermia, cancer therapy, and drug delivery; they also find applications in catalysis [10,11,12] and in magnetic separation [13,14]. Among other metal nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles have been more extensively studied in clinical practice [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If laparotomy is performed, such a handheld probe may be used intraoperatively along with fluorescence-imaging to help guide SLN localization. For laparoscopic or robotic-assisted procedures, ‘drop-in’ magnetometer probes capable of fitting through trocar ports are currently being developed [ 32 , 33 ] and would provide a less invasive means for intraoperative magnetometer detection. Such probes are not currently commercially available, and there exist several non-trivial technical hurdles that have to be overcome—for example, reducing the probe size to fit through a trocar port greatly reduces magnetometer sensitivity, and metal laparoscopic or robotic instruments can induce spurious magnetometer signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, in settings where pseudo‐dynamic MRI is not possible or where the first MRI scan shows multiple draining LNs, we propose that magnetometer signal stratification between node levels could be used to identify the SLN and potentially provide a signal threshold level—such as the “10%” criterion opted to help define magnetic SLNs in breast cancer 32 . In addition, future development of specialized “drop‐in” probes could aid intraoperative signal confirmation during robotic or laparoscopic SLNB, as has been demonstrated with gamma‐guidance in the abdomen and pelvis 33 and is currently being researched for magnetic‐guidance using novel magnetometer probe designs 34,35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 32 In addition, future development of specialized “drop‐in” probes could aid intraoperative signal confirmation during robotic or laparoscopic SLNB, as has been demonstrated with gamma‐guidance in the abdomen and pelvis 33 and is currently being researched for magnetic‐guidance using novel magnetometer probe designs. 34 , 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%