2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of 300 and 100 nm Particles in Fabry–Perot Acoustofluidic Resonators

Abstract: Separation of particles on the order of 100 nm with acoustophoresis has been challenging to date because of the competing natures of the acoustic radiation force and acoustic streaming on the particles. In this work, we present a surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based device that integrates a Fabry-Perot type acoustic resonator into a microfluidic channel to separate submicrometer particles. This configuration enhances the overall acoustic radiation force on the particles and thereby offers controlled manipulation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For microparticles below a critical size, * weiqiu@fysik.dtu.dk † bruus@fysik.dtu.dk ‡ per.augustsson@bme.lth.se the motion of microparticles is dominated by acoustic streaming, which in many cases hinders the manipulation of sub-micrometer sized particles. Manipulation below the classical limit has previously been demonstrated by flow vortices generated by two-dimensional acoustic fields [29,30], by acoustically active seed particles [24], by a thin reflector design [31], or in systems actuated by surface acoustic waves [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For microparticles below a critical size, * weiqiu@fysik.dtu.dk † bruus@fysik.dtu.dk ‡ per.augustsson@bme.lth.se the motion of microparticles is dominated by acoustic streaming, which in many cases hinders the manipulation of sub-micrometer sized particles. Manipulation below the classical limit has previously been demonstrated by flow vortices generated by two-dimensional acoustic fields [29,30], by acoustically active seed particles [24], by a thin reflector design [31], or in systems actuated by surface acoustic waves [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods are actively being used in contemporary acoustofluidics as is evident from the following examples published in the literature the past two years. BAW devices have been used for cell focusing in simple and inexpensive aluminum devices [20], for binary particle separation in droplet microfluidics [21], for hematocrit determination [22], for enrichment of tumor cells from blood [23], and for manipulation of C. elegans [24,25], while SAW devices have been used for nanoparticle separation [26,27], for self-aligned particle focusing and patterning [28], for enhanced cell sorting [29], and for in-droplet microparticle separation [30]. Currently, the acoustofluidic devices with the highest throughput are of the BAW type [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these streamingbased methods have low selectivity. More recently, SAW devices have been developed to focus [22] and separate [23,24] nanoparticles. In particular, Sehgal and Kirby [23] demonstrated separation between 100-nm-and 300-nmdiameter particles at a proof-of-concept stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, SAW devices have been developed to focus [22] and separate [23,24] nanoparticles. In particular, Sehgal and Kirby [23] demonstrated separation between 100-nm-and 300-nmdiameter particles at a proof-of-concept stage. To fully utilize the potential of this and similar devices, further development is necessary to increase the efficiency and the sorting flow rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%