2012
DOI: 10.7232/jkiie.2012.38.2.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation Heuristic for the Rank-1 Chvatal-Gomory Inequalities for the Binary Knapsack Problem

Abstract: An efficient separation heuristic for the rank-1 Chvatal-Gomory cuts for the binary knapsack problem is proposed. The proposed heuristic is based on the decomposition property of the separation problem for the fixedcharge 0-1 knapsack problem characterized by Park and Lee [14]. Computational tests on the benchmark instances of the generalized assignment problem show that the proposed heuristic procedure can generate strong rank-1 C-G cuts more efficiently than the exact rank-1 C-G cut separation and the exact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these focus on lifted cover inequalities (e.g., [2,3,8,12,13,15,16,18,23,26]), but there are a few papers on other families of inequalities. These include weight inequalities [22], lifted pack inequalities [1,16], Chvátal-Gomory cuts [17], Fenchel cuts [4], and the inequalities in [5], which are (somewhat confusingly) called knapsack cover inequalities. These last inequalities have received very little attention in the literature, and have not been analysed from a polyhedral point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these focus on lifted cover inequalities (e.g., [2,3,8,12,13,15,16,18,23,26]), but there are a few papers on other families of inequalities. These include weight inequalities [22], lifted pack inequalities [1,16], Chvátal-Gomory cuts [17], Fenchel cuts [4], and the inequalities in [5], which are (somewhat confusingly) called knapsack cover inequalities. These last inequalities have received very little attention in the literature, and have not been analysed from a polyhedral point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%