Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2688073.2688101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation between Estimation and Approximation

Abstract: We show (under standard assumptions) that there are NP optimization problems for which estimation is easier than approximation. Namely, one can estimate the value of the optimal solution within a ratio of ρ, but it is difficult to find a solution whose value is within ρ of optimal. As an important special case, we show that there are linear programming relaxations for which no polynomial time rounding technique matches the integrality gap of the linear program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though it seems likely, we cannot know for sure that such an approximation algorithm exists. Feige and Jozeph even gave a proof that under some complexity assumptions there must be problems with estimation algorithms superior to the best approximation algorithms [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though it seems likely, we cannot know for sure that such an approximation algorithm exists. Feige and Jozeph even gave a proof that under some complexity assumptions there must be problems with estimation algorithms superior to the best approximation algorithms [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will use the terminology of Feige and Jozeph [FJ15] to distinguish between estimation and approximation of optimization problems (where the goal is to find a feasible solution of optimal value). An approximation algorithm is required to output a feasible solution whose value is close to the value of an optimal solution, e.g., output a feasible matching of nearoptimal size.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can then use a result of Alon [Alo96], in turn based on an elegant entropy-based approach of Shearer [She95], to show that such graphs have non-trivially large independents sets. However, this argument is non-algorithmic; it shows that the lifted SDP has a small integrality gap, but does not give a corresponding approximation algorithm with running time sub-exponential in n. This leads to the question whether this approach can be converted into an approximation algorithm that outputs a set of size Ω(log 2 d/d) times the optimal independent set, or if there is a gap between the approximability and estimability of this problem (as recently shown for an NP problem by Feige and Jozeph [FJ14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%