1999
DOI: 10.2307/2586763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation and Weak König's Lemma

Abstract: Abstract. We continue the work of [14,3,1, 19,16, 4,12,11, 20] investigating the strength of set existence axioms needed for separable Banach space theory. We show that the separation theorem for open convex sets is equivalent to WKL 0 over RCA 0 . We show that the separation theorem for separably closed convex sets is equivalent to ACA 0 over RCA 0 . Our strategy for proving these geometrical Hahn-Banach theorems is to reduce to the finite-dimensional case by means of a compactness argument.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our constructions will use a result from the development of Banach spaces in [12], and draw on ideas from the corresponding developments in recursive mathematics [20] and constructive mathematics [1]. There are, however, subtleties and key differences, some of which are discussed at the end of this section.…”
Section: Bases and Independent Generating Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our constructions will use a result from the development of Banach spaces in [12], and draw on ideas from the corresponding developments in recursive mathematics [20] and constructive mathematics [1]. There are, however, subtleties and key differences, some of which are discussed at the end of this section.…”
Section: Bases and Independent Generating Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following lemma is a consequence of Humphreys and Simpson [12]; see also the "independence criterion" in [20, page 143], or [17, Lemma 2.4-1].…”
Section: Proof Let σ Be a Finite Sequence Of Elements Of A That Spanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exploit the ideas of this proof to show Sep c HB. The original proof by Brown and Simpson of the "forward direction" (showing that WKL 0 proves the separable Hahn-Banach Theorem) has been simplified first by Shioji and Tanaka ([17], this is essentially the proof contained in [19,§IV.9]) and then by Humphreys and Simpson [11]. No details of these or other proofs of the Hahn-Banach Theorem are needed for showing HB c Sep. Brattka noticed the possibility of avoiding these details in [2] and wrote, "Surprisingly, the proof of this theorem does not require a constructivization of the classical proof but just an 'external analysis'."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%