1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02493611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation and identification of ceramides in the human stratum corneum by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and electrospray multiple-stage mass spectrometry profiling

Abstract: SummaryA sensitive, selective, and rapid method is described for analysis ofceramides in the human stratum corneum by direct coupling of HPLC with an electrospray ion-trap mass spectrometry. Nonaqueous reversed-phase chromatography stabilizes the electrospray ionization, resulting in sensitivity that enables direct measurement of skin lipid extracts with no special sample preparation. Assignment of individual signals to the corresponding ceramide species is based on interpretation of the fragment spectra from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An advantage of ion traps is their capability to perform multiple stage MS (MS n ), which allows for structure elucidation by stepwise fragmentation, provided that the software is able to control MS n . This was also demonstrated for stratum corneum ceramides by Vietzke et al [75]. A number of other papers described the successful use of ESI-MS/MS to characterize ceramides in biological samples [83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…An advantage of ion traps is their capability to perform multiple stage MS (MS n ), which allows for structure elucidation by stepwise fragmentation, provided that the software is able to control MS n . This was also demonstrated for stratum corneum ceramides by Vietzke et al [75]. A number of other papers described the successful use of ESI-MS/MS to characterize ceramides in biological samples [83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…To analyze CERs in human SC using LC-MS, we decided to use NP and ESI modes in LC and MS, respectively, because the NP mode may enable the class separation of diverse CERs that have chain distributions both in the fatty acid and sphingoid moieties based on differences in their polarities, whereas the ESI mode seems to be the best for the LC-MS analysis of CERs, as demonstrated in many analytical studies (14,15,(32)(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Optimization Of Nplc-esi-ms Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates However, there seemed to be no tendency that specifi c fatty acid or sphingoid moieties are related to the greater RSD. This might be related to relatively unstable performances of NPLC-ESI-MS, especially on separate days, compared with RPLC-ESI-MS that is stable and commonly used in the analyses of CERs (22,(30)(31)(32). Relative response values are a ratio of the slope of the calibration curve (100-1000 fmol) each for 11 authentic CERs to that of the internal standard CER[N(17)S (18) (3) responses of isobaric species may be substantially similar to each other.…”
Section: Simultaneous Sim Measurement In Nplc-esi-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize differences in lipidomes among biological samples of interest, the relative intensities or areas given from mass spectrometers are only helpful as semi-quantitative values ( 11,12 ). Precise quantitative values of lipidomes of interest would also be desirable, especially in the case of evaluations of lipid dynamics in de MS has been employed for the analysis of CERs in human SC as follows: reversed-phase LC (RPLC)-ESI-MS ( 22,(30)(31)(32); ESI-MS ( 33,34 ); RPLC-thermospray-MS ( 35 ); and NPLC-APCI-MS (36)(37)(38)(39). However, those methods were not validated as quantitative methods for overall CER species in the SC, although some studies reported quantitative values based on unrealistic assumptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%