2020
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2019.2953092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating the Structural Components of Maize for Field Phenotyping Using Terrestrial LiDAR Data and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our method has an advantage of reliably calculating the relative value of leaf to panicle ratio using 2D photos, on which the leaf and panicle in the 3D stand is compressed proportionally according to the imaging principle of the camera. Recently, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has shown its advantages for showing high resolution 3-dimensional (3D) structural information of terrain and vegetation [42][43][44] and the advantage for segmentation of plant organs [16,45,46]. Shi et al [18] also showed that a multi-view 3D system can avoid these errors.…”
Section: Weakness Of the Methodology And Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our method has an advantage of reliably calculating the relative value of leaf to panicle ratio using 2D photos, on which the leaf and panicle in the 3D stand is compressed proportionally according to the imaging principle of the camera. Recently, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has shown its advantages for showing high resolution 3-dimensional (3D) structural information of terrain and vegetation [42][43][44] and the advantage for segmentation of plant organs [16,45,46]. Shi et al [18] also showed that a multi-view 3D system can avoid these errors.…”
Section: Weakness Of the Methodology And Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our method has an advantage of reliably calculating the relative value of leaf to panicle ratio using 2D photos, on which the leaf and panicle in the 3D stand is compressed proportionally according to the imaging principle of the camera. Recently, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has shown its advantages for showing high resolution 3-dimensional (3D) structural information of terrain and vegetation [41][42][43] and the advantage for segmentation of plant organs [16,44,45]. Shi et al [18] also showed that a multi-view 3D system can avoid these errors.…”
Section: Weakness Of the Methodology And Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this may be that commonly used open-source point cloud data do not contain LRI information, but rather point-wise spatial coordinates. Meanwhile, configuring these CNN-based models which do not use the LRI-related features for point cloud classification, such as PointNet++ [24], VCNN [35], and PointCNN [29], requires the use of a GPU. Thus, we did not compare the FWCNN model with such CNN-based models in this study.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Classifiers Using Lri Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one type of deep learning model, convolution neural network (CNN)-based models have shown high accuracy in digital image identification and semantic recognition due to their excellent self-abstraction and generalization abilities in extracting features from large volume datasets [33,34]. However, only a few studies have focused on the applications of deep learning models in discriminating foliage and woody components from TLS data of forests and crops, where the plants were always with complex structure features [26,35]. Existing deep learning models, such as PointNet [33] and PointNet++ [24], were based on global or local geometrical features to classify point cloud data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%