2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2019.100313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating stars from quasars: Machine learning investigation using photometric data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the boundary definition, or which photometric bands and aperture types to use -are often based on a few low-dimensional projections of a complex high-dimensional space. On the other hand, modern machine learning methods enable us to automatically make such choices in a data-driven way, utilizing the entire multidimensional parameter space (Gao, Zhang & Zhao 2008;Kim, Brunner & Carrasco Kind 2015;Makhija et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the boundary definition, or which photometric bands and aperture types to use -are often based on a few low-dimensional projections of a complex high-dimensional space. On the other hand, modern machine learning methods enable us to automatically make such choices in a data-driven way, utilizing the entire multidimensional parameter space (Gao, Zhang & Zhao 2008;Kim, Brunner & Carrasco Kind 2015;Makhija et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As further proof of the efficacy of our proposed activation function, prior work by Saha and his group, Makhija et al [56] uses a special case of our activation function in the discriminator network of a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) to achieve exemplary performance in separating stars from quasars, outperforming the same architecture with the sigmoid activation. We defer to Makhija et al [56] for a more detailed explanation of the method. The same activation was also used on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset by Sridhar et al [57], and was found to outperform both the sigmoid and ReLU activations.…”
Section: Monotonicity Of Sbafmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…With the advent of large surveys like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, York et al 2000), optical data could be coupled with space-based MIR data to find the stellar locus in a 10-dimensional color-space (Davenport et al 2014). Recent efforts to separate stars from quasars, or perform a regression on effective temperature with machine learning on photometric data have been successful (Makhija et al 2019;Bai et al 2019); however, these studies are often focused on main sequence, low mass stars. This is an understandable choice given the rarity of evolved, high mass stars, the absence of reliable distances to calculate luminosities from which to select putative massive stars, and the fact that followup spectroscopy is necessary in order to confirm a star's membership in many important classes.…”
Section: Classifier Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%