The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating grazing and rainfall effects at regional scale using remote sensing imagery: A dynamic reference-cover method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the work done by Bastin et al (2012) who showed that it was the relative difference between a pixel cover value and a reference value that was more important for predicting the condition of a region. …”
Section: Sentinel-2 Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with the work done by Bastin et al (2012) who showed that it was the relative difference between a pixel cover value and a reference value that was more important for predicting the condition of a region. …”
Section: Sentinel-2 Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effect of degradation on PV cover was clear; a reduction in PV cover of 11.3% (Table 7) and 17% for scaled PV cover (Table 2). PV cover, while not the only component of vegetation cover, is closely related to previous interpretations of vegetation cover loss in degradation studies [50] and as was shown by the moderate agreement between scaled PV cover and the ABCD condition map [43] (k = 0.6, Table 5). Furthermore, in other Australian rangelands, between 10% and 30% reductions in vegetation cover have been reported [51,52].…”
Section: Degradation and Components Of Fractional Cover In The Bdtsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, without additional data on land usage, such as livestock numbers and management practices, the causes of the reductions by human-related activities are hard to determine (Bastin et al, 2012). The most commonly cited management practices to reduce degradation are reduction in domestic livestock, reduction in feral herbivores, removal of watering points (Bastin et al, 2012;Fensham and Fairfax, 2008;Silcock and Fensham, 2013), fallowing (Bastin et al, 1993(Bastin et al, , 2012, or encouraging vegetation that is particularly resistant to overgrazing or able to recover quickly after intense grazing (Bastin et al, 2012;McKeon et al, 2004;. Additional data are needed to interpret low LNS, particularly with field observation.…”
Section: Anthropogenic and Environmental Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%