Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2019
DOI: 10.17169/fqs-20.2.3196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating "Fact" from Fiction: Strategies to Improve Rigour in Historical Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brinkmann et al (2014) indicate that qualitative research captures historical 'voices' that include conceptual, internal, and repressed history to represent vibrant, integrated perspectives that are rich and diverse from evolved social history. Langtree et al (2019) advocate separating fact from fiction by employing strategies for improving the rigor of data trustworthiness that include checking credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability. These relate to investigative sources of historical information to collate data, identify sources of criticism and analysis, prolonged engagement, reflexive bracketing, and historical dissemination patterns (Korstjens & Moser, 2017;Korstjens & Moser, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brinkmann et al (2014) indicate that qualitative research captures historical 'voices' that include conceptual, internal, and repressed history to represent vibrant, integrated perspectives that are rich and diverse from evolved social history. Langtree et al (2019) advocate separating fact from fiction by employing strategies for improving the rigor of data trustworthiness that include checking credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability. These relate to investigative sources of historical information to collate data, identify sources of criticism and analysis, prolonged engagement, reflexive bracketing, and historical dissemination patterns (Korstjens & Moser, 2017;Korstjens & Moser, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included identifying descriptions, phrases, patterns of responses, references to cultural artefacts, and social facts (Bowen, 2009;Morgan, 2022). Using a combination of measures for trustworthiness and rigor, the following steps were used in the initial retrieval of documents: (i) employ purposive data sampling; (ii) review the document initially to confirm the content and context; (iii) read again for descriptive elements related to research inquiry; (iv) identify rich data aspects for interpretation; and (v) set aside for further thematic and content analysis (Bowen, 2009;Gill et al, 2018;Hamilton, 2020;Korstjens & Moser, 2017;Korstjens & Moser, 2018;Langtree et al, 2019;Morgan, 2022;Stahl & King, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%