1997
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1473:sdsomi>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating Different Scales of Motion in Time Series of Meteorological Variables

Abstract: The removal of synoptic and seasonal signals from time series of meteorological variables leaves datasets amenable to the study of trends, climate change, and the reasons for such trends and changes. In this paper, four techniques for separating different scales of motion are examined and their effectiveness compared. These techniques are PEST, anomalies, wavelet transform, and the Kolmogorov-Zurbenko (KZ) filter. It is shown that PEST and anomalies do not cleanly separate the synoptic and seasonal signals fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Mehrotra and Sharma (2016) corrected lag 1 autocorrelation statistics at daily, monthly, quarterly, and annual time scales. With MBCn, one could decompose a given time series into different time scales, for example using a multiresolution wavelet analysis or Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filtering (Eskridge et al 1997), simultaneously bias correct the partitioned time series, and then reconstruct the original series. The basic approach can easily be extended to both space and time dimensions of multiple variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Mehrotra and Sharma (2016) corrected lag 1 autocorrelation statistics at daily, monthly, quarterly, and annual time scales. With MBCn, one could decompose a given time series into different time scales, for example using a multiresolution wavelet analysis or Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filtering (Eskridge et al 1997), simultaneously bias correct the partitioned time series, and then reconstruct the original series. The basic approach can easily be extended to both space and time dimensions of multiple variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While biases in spatial dependence are strongest in summer, a similar pattern of results is evident in the other seasons. Table 1 shows seasonal values of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, the maximum difference between Spatial and temporal scales for a meteorological field like precipitation are intrinsically linked (Eskridge et al 1997). Does correcting spatial coherence lead to an attendant improvement in temporal dependence?…”
Section: Spatial Precipitation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monthly anomalies were obtained as departures from monthly mean climatology for the period of 1958-2001; then, the KolmogorovZurbenko (KZ) filter [Eskridge et al, 1997] was applied to remove high-frequency (less than six months) and longer-than-ENSO scale (8 years) variations. The KZ filter gives iterative moving average that removes highfrequency variation relative to the window size; the method cleanly separates various time scales of meteorological variables and has the same accuracy as the wavelet method.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing now on the statistical methodologies employed, a short description of KZ filters is given (for details, see Eskridge et al 1997;Rao et al 1997). They consist of a series of iterative moving averages aiming at the removal of high-frequency variations from the initial data and, therefore, modifying the observations and the corresponding model forecasts into a compatible form.…”
Section: Kolmogorov-zurbenko Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%