DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73420-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating Deterministic from Nondeterministic NOF Multiparty Communication Complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that Theorem 1.1 in particular implies an exponential separation between nondeterministic and deterministic protocols (hence, NP cc k ⊂ P cc k for k = δ log n players). Similar separations follow from [BDPW07], but only for non-explicit functions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also note that Theorem 1.1 in particular implies an exponential separation between nondeterministic and deterministic protocols (hence, NP cc k ⊂ P cc k for k = δ log n players). Similar separations follow from [BDPW07], but only for non-explicit functions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…One of the most fundamental questions in number-on-forehead communication complexity, and the main question addressed in this paper, is to separate these classes. In [BDPW07], Beame et al give an exponential separation between randomized and deterministic protocols for k ≤ n O(1) players (in particular, RP cc k = P cc k for k ≤ n O(1) ). The breakthrough work by Sherstov [She09,She08a] sparked a flurry of exciting results in communication complexity [Cha07,LS08,CA08] which gave an exponential separation between nondeterministic and randomized protocols for k < log log n players (in particular, NP cc k ⊂ BPP cc k for k < log log n).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f0; 1g is a k-party number-on-the-forehead communication problem, is considered to be efficiently solvable by a given class of protocols if F n has communication complexity at most log c n; for a large enough constant c > 1 and all n > c: This convention allows one to define BPP k ; NP k ; coNP k ; and MA k as the classes of families with efficient randomized, nondeterministic, co-nondeterministic, and Merlin-Arthur protocols, respectively. In recent years, the relationships among these classes have been almost fully determined [9,35,19,22,11,10,23]. It particular, for k .log n/; it is known [10,23] that coNP k is not contained in BPP k ; NP k ; or even MA k : As a corollary to Theorem 1.4, we show that coNP k can be separated from all these classes by a particularly simple function, set disjointness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In recent years, the relationships among these classes have been almost fully determined [9,35,19,22,11,10,23]. It particular, for k .log n/; it is known [10,23] that coNP k is not contained in BPP k ; NP k ; or even MA k : As a corollary to Theorem 1.4, we show that coNP k can be separated from all these classes by a particularly simple function, set disjointness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Non-explicit separations for a large number of parties are given in [5]. Recent progress on explicit separations [35,34,19,27,16,23,8] was sparked by the work by Sherstov [35,34], see his survey [33].…”
Section: Theorem 12 (Nondeterminism Vs Determinism)mentioning
confidence: 99%