The Eurosceptical Reader 2 2001
DOI: 10.1057/9780230510760_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separate Ways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And proud too of the way in which for centuries Britain was a home for people from the rest of Europe who sought sanctuary from tyranny’ (Thatcher 1988a). On the other hand, this theme can be worked into a nationalist and/or jingoistic Eurosceptic reading of the national story, wherein the libertarian British Us is juxtaposed against a malign Them across the Channel, as in former Labour parliamentarian and prominent Eurosceptic Peter Shore's account of the ‘separate history’ that marks Britain apart from Europe (Shore 2002, 228). Every advance in integration (whether new policy area or formal treaty) can, in the Eurosceptic reading, be interpreted as an infringement of British liberties, understood to incorporate everything from legal and parliamentary sovereignty to the rights of individuals to live their daily lives free from the pernicious interference of Brussels ‘bureaucrats’ (Minogue 2008).…”
Section: Locating the Eurosceptic Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And proud too of the way in which for centuries Britain was a home for people from the rest of Europe who sought sanctuary from tyranny’ (Thatcher 1988a). On the other hand, this theme can be worked into a nationalist and/or jingoistic Eurosceptic reading of the national story, wherein the libertarian British Us is juxtaposed against a malign Them across the Channel, as in former Labour parliamentarian and prominent Eurosceptic Peter Shore's account of the ‘separate history’ that marks Britain apart from Europe (Shore 2002, 228). Every advance in integration (whether new policy area or formal treaty) can, in the Eurosceptic reading, be interpreted as an infringement of British liberties, understood to incorporate everything from legal and parliamentary sovereignty to the rights of individuals to live their daily lives free from the pernicious interference of Brussels ‘bureaucrats’ (Minogue 2008).…”
Section: Locating the Eurosceptic Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Britain in Europe published Why You Should Vote Yes and the National Referendum Campaign issued Why You Should Vote No, whilst the Labour government distributed New Deal for Europe, its pamphlet in favour of membership, to every household in Britain. Shore 16 highlighted two assurances in the government's document that turned out to be untrue. The ®rst was the statement that:…”
Section: The Third Pro-european Propaganda Campaign (1974±1975)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Lord Shore, Wilson's Parliamentary Secretary 1964-66 adds that he believed Wilson wanted to demonstrate once and for all the impossibility of membership. 5 This article will argue that despite the fact that the government was moving towards a policy towards European membership prior to October 1966, the July sterling crisis was still decisive in forcing Wilson's hand towards the EEC. 6…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%