Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems 1995
DOI: 10.1145/212433.212449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separability of polyhedra for optimal filtering of spatial and constraint data

Abstract: The filtering method considered in this paper is based on approximation of a spatial object in d-dimensional space by the minimal convex polyhedron that encloses the object and whose facets are normal to preselected axes. These axes are not necessarily the standard coordinate axes and, furthermore, their number is not determined by the dimension of the space.' We optimize filtering by selecting optimal such axes based on analysis of stored objects or a sample thereof. The number of axes selected represents a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the problem of poor filtering, Brodsky et al [1995] proposed methods for effectively computing a set of optimal axes for separating polyhedra. This work continues the line of work by Jagadish [1990c] in the use of nonstandard axes for better filtering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the problem of poor filtering, Brodsky et al [1995] proposed methods for effectively computing a set of optimal axes for separating polyhedra. This work continues the line of work by Jagadish [1990c] in the use of nonstandard axes for better filtering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These representations adaptations of the strip tree [Ballard 1981] and the Douglas-Peucker generalization algorithm [Douglas 1990;Douglas and Peucker 1973;Saalfeld 1987] for curves in two dimensions. The number of sides as well as the number of their possible orientations may be expanded so that it is arbitrary (e.g., a convex hull [Brinkhoff et al 1994]), or bounded although greater than the dimensionality of the underlying space (e.g., the P-tree [Jagadish 1990b] and k-DOP [Klosowski et al 1998] where the number of possible orientations is bounded, and the minimum bounding polybox [Brodsky et al 1995], which attempts to find the optimal orientations). The most general solution is the convex hull, which is often approximated by a minimum bounding polygon of a fixed number of sides having either an arbitrary orientation (e.g., the minimum bounding n-corner [Dori and Ben-Bassat 1983;Schiwietz H. Samet 1993;Schiwietz and Kriegel 1993]) or a fixed orientation usually parallel to the coordinate axes (e.g., [Esperança and Samet 1997]).…”
Section: Unit-size Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting approach to determine upper bound approximations has been proposed in [12], to improve the selectivity of filtering. The approach is based on the notion of a minimum bounding polybox.…”
Section: Example 5 Consider the Tree Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These axes are not necessarily the standard coordinate axes and, furthermore, their number is not determined by the dimension of the space. The problem of minimizing the number of axes required to achieve a given quality of filtering, as well as the reverse problem of optimizing the quality of filtering when the number of axes is given, are some important topics [12].…”
Section: Example 5 Consider the Tree Inmentioning
confidence: 99%