1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00671.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel Node Dissection in the Treatment of Melanoma

Abstract: Our preliminary findings in this limited series suggests that sentinel node dissection appears to be a procedure of low morbidity and relatively high predictive value.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, intraoperative frozen section examination with H&E may miss occult nodal metastases for sampling error problems. Conversely, the complete examination of the entire lymph node by means of serial sectioning and immunohistochemical techniques or PCR for tyrosinase mRNA (a gene product specific to melanin-producing cells) can detect micrometastases in 16-30% of the sN which are judged negative by routine H&E staining; moreover, frozen section analysis might waste potentially diagnostic material that may contain micrometastases [28][29][30][31]. Tanis et al [32] examined 99 patients who underwent sN biopsy with frozen section examination, and reported a sensitivity of 47% (8 of 17), a specificity of 100% (82 of 82), and a negative predictive value of 90% (82 of 91); the benefit of frozen section examination in avoiding a twostage procedure was 7% (8 of 99).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, intraoperative frozen section examination with H&E may miss occult nodal metastases for sampling error problems. Conversely, the complete examination of the entire lymph node by means of serial sectioning and immunohistochemical techniques or PCR for tyrosinase mRNA (a gene product specific to melanin-producing cells) can detect micrometastases in 16-30% of the sN which are judged negative by routine H&E staining; moreover, frozen section analysis might waste potentially diagnostic material that may contain micrometastases [28][29][30][31]. Tanis et al [32] examined 99 patients who underwent sN biopsy with frozen section examination, and reported a sensitivity of 47% (8 of 17), a specificity of 100% (82 of 82), and a negative predictive value of 90% (82 of 91); the benefit of frozen section examination in avoiding a twostage procedure was 7% (8 of 99).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our patients, we observed no side effects to intradermal injection of vital blue dye and/or radiocolloid [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A highly debated issue regarding sN biopsy concerns whether to perform intraoperative frozen-section examination (so as to select patients with sN metastasis to regional lymphadenectomy in a 'one-stage' procedure), or wait for definitive histopathological examination of the sN; usually (as a matter of fact), the therapeutic dissection is performed as the second phase of a 'two-stage' procedure (sN biopsy at first, followed by lymph node dissection a few days later as soon as the metastatic involvement of the sN is shown by histopathology examination using H&E and immunohistochemical staining) [25][26][27][28]. These two approaches also imply a different in-hospital management of patients undergoing sN biopsy, because the first step of a 'two-stage' procedure could be safely performed in a 'daysurgery' facility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%