2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13050885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel-1 Big Data Processing with P-SBAS InSAR in the Geohazards Exploitation Platform: An Experiment on Coastal Land Subsidence and Landslides in Italy

Abstract: The growing volume of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery acquired by satellite constellations creates novel opportunities and opens new challenges for interferometric SAR (InSAR) applications to observe Earth’s surface processes and geohazards. In this paper, the Parallel Small BAseline Subset (P-SBAS) advanced InSAR processing chain running on the Geohazards Exploitation Platform (GEP) is trialed to process two unprecedentedly big stacks of Copernicus Sentinel-1 C-band SAR images acquired in 2014–2020 ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SAR, InSAR) technique has been greatly developed and widely used to serve geohazard monitoring processes, such as those for mining subsidence [1][2][3], landslides [4][5][6], earthquakes [7][8][9], and volcano eruptions [10][11][12]. Especially when integrating multi-temporal SAR images with advanced time series InSAR (TS-InSAR) methods (e.g., persistent scatter (PS), small baseline subset (SBAS), and mixed PS/SBAS methods) [13][14][15][16][17], the inherent errors in a single interferogram (e.g., decorrelation noise and atmospheric delay) can be effectively mitigated, and simultaneously, the deformation time series of the study area can be obtained, which is of great significance for understanding the evolution process and mechanism of geohazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SAR, InSAR) technique has been greatly developed and widely used to serve geohazard monitoring processes, such as those for mining subsidence [1][2][3], landslides [4][5][6], earthquakes [7][8][9], and volcano eruptions [10][11][12]. Especially when integrating multi-temporal SAR images with advanced time series InSAR (TS-InSAR) methods (e.g., persistent scatter (PS), small baseline subset (SBAS), and mixed PS/SBAS methods) [13][14][15][16][17], the inherent errors in a single interferogram (e.g., decorrelation noise and atmospheric delay) can be effectively mitigated, and simultaneously, the deformation time series of the study area can be obtained, which is of great significance for understanding the evolution process and mechanism of geohazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using computer program, formulas ( 15)-( 18) were programmed to realize the Markov random process, and the predicted results were obtained for the two models. The predicted results are as shown from figure 7 to figure 10: [4][5][6][7] show the predicted accuracy for subsidence data at each monitoring point after the optimization of the Gray-Markov model. We get the predicted accuracy by calculating the ratio of the true value to the predicted value.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Gray-markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InSAR technology has the advantages of all-weather use, low cost, large coverage, and high spatial resolution. One example is Sentinel-1 TOPS (Terrain Observation with Progressive Scans in azimuth) mode SAR data (open to all users) [6,7]. Ideally, SAR data obtained using the TOPS mode can monitor about 40,000 2 km for 6 days (with two satellites) with a return period of 12 days to produce surface deformation maps with a spatial resolution of about 20 m (including all mining areas in this range) [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have already shown the capability of this system for efficient MTI analysis using a variety of SAR sensors (Galve et al, 2017, Cigna andTapete, 2021).…”
Section: Geohazard Monitoring For Large Areas (Gep)mentioning
confidence: 99%