2019 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccisci.2019.8716394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Classifier: Logistic Regression for Arabic Services’ Reviews in Lebanon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several implementations have considered the Arabic language for conducting SA using ML. For instance, Al Omari et al [35], logistic regression (LR) was applied on data extracted from reviews (including restaurant reviews) posted on Google and Zomato about public services in Lebanon. Several ML algorithms, namely, KNN, NB, SVM, LR, and RF, were applied for SA by Alharbi and Qamar [36] to assess customers' reviews about restaurants and cafes in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several implementations have considered the Arabic language for conducting SA using ML. For instance, Al Omari et al [35], logistic regression (LR) was applied on data extracted from reviews (including restaurant reviews) posted on Google and Zomato about public services in Lebanon. Several ML algorithms, namely, KNN, NB, SVM, LR, and RF, were applied for SA by Alharbi and Qamar [36] to assess customers' reviews about restaurants and cafes in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the MPAN model are shown in bold in the first column. This performance is expected, since the MPAN model produces state-of-the-art results on international public datasets such as those given in table VII [54] 92.1 BERT [9] 95.8 MT-DNN [55] 94.1 XLNet [56] 92.3 T5-11B [57] 92.0 IMDB = Movie Reviews Dataset; SNLI = Stanford Natural Language Inference Dataset; QQP = Quora Question Pairs; SciTail = Science Entailment; MultiNLI = Multiple Natural Language Inference [45] 95.98 88.10 94.24 AHS (sub) [45] 96.72 96.68 95.10 Ar-twitter [28] 94.47 85.01 84.20 88.10 ArSAS [46] 96.01 81.52 ASTD [30] 94.02 79.07 79.18 76.41 74.98 LABR [44] 96.43 89.60 LARGE Attraction Reviews [29] 98.65 96.20 LARGE Hotel Reviews [29] 97.83 91.70 LARGE Movie Reviews [29] 93.08 80.70 LARGE Products Reviews [29] 96.13 87.30 LARGE Restaurant Reviews [29] 96.07 78.50 OCLAR [47] 95.97 90.30 OD [35] 95.75 94.33 SMP(SYR) [42] 96.00 85.28 81.28 [58]. Alternatively, semi supervised MPAN models will also be explored, e.g., building on [59].…”
Section: B Performance Comparisons and Analysis For Asa Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LR is an algorithm derived from a linear regression-based approach for predicting probability-dependent variables. This method performs well for binary classification tasks [29]. A logistic function or sigmoid function is used in this method to map a predicted value to a probabilistic number between 0 and 1.…”
Section: Classification Model Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%