2020
DOI: 10.3390/iot1020014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Data of World Cup Soccer Tournament Using Machine Learning

Abstract: In the derived approach, an analysis is performed on Twitter data for World Cup soccer 2014 held in Brazil to detect the sentiment of the people throughout the world using machine learning techniques. By filtering and analyzing the data using natural language processing techniques, sentiment polarity was calculated based on the emotion words detected in the user tweets. The dataset is normalized to be used by machine learning algorithms and prepared using natural language processing techniques like word tokeni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The third experiment assesses the Chi-square, Information Gain, Gain Ratio, and Gini Index approaches in order to determine the approach with high classification rate. The fourth experiment is did to prove the effectiveness of our suggested approach in terms of AC, TPR, ER, TNR, FS, FPR, KS, FNR, PR, and TC compared to ID3, C4.5, Soni et al [39], Ngoc et al [40], Lakshmi et al [51], AitAddi et al [56], Patel et al [57], and Wang et al [58] approaches. Finally, the fifth experiment is performed to proved the performance of our classifier in terms of complexity, stability and convergence compared to Soni et al [39], Ngoc et al [40], Lakshmi et al [51], AitAddi et al [56], Patel et al [57], and Wang et al [58] classifiers.…”
Section: B Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The third experiment assesses the Chi-square, Information Gain, Gain Ratio, and Gini Index approaches in order to determine the approach with high classification rate. The fourth experiment is did to prove the effectiveness of our suggested approach in terms of AC, TPR, ER, TNR, FS, FPR, KS, FNR, PR, and TC compared to ID3, C4.5, Soni et al [39], Ngoc et al [40], Lakshmi et al [51], AitAddi et al [56], Patel et al [57], and Wang et al [58] approaches. Finally, the fifth experiment is performed to proved the performance of our classifier in terms of complexity, stability and convergence compared to Soni et al [39], Ngoc et al [40], Lakshmi et al [51], AitAddi et al [56], Patel et al [57], and Wang et al [58] classifiers.…”
Section: B Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newest innovative research papers for the OM are Lakshmi et al [51]; Guerreiro et al [52]; Mehta et al [53]; Zhang [54]; Lopez-Chau et al [55]; AitAddi et al [56]; Patel et al [57]; Wang et al [58] as presented in the Table 5. In [51], the authors proposed a new contribution that intends to classify reviews using two classifiers and determine which of the both perform better performance.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the negative class classification, the three methods have the same F-1, but in the positive class classification, the Linear SVM shows the best performance with an F-1 Score value of 0.66 compared to the other two methods. (Redhu, Srivastava, Bansal, & Gupta, 2018) Patel & Passi (Patel & Passi, 2020) compared the Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbor methods to classify reviews about the 2014 World Cup into three class: positive neutral, and negative. Data taken from Twitter in June-July 2014 and obtained about 2 million tweets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presents a problem as the neural network sentiment analysis is commonly domain-specific. Another work [ 43 ] also examined sentiment analysis on Twitter data of the World Cup soccer 2014, but explore the overall sentiment of the event and not concussion specific.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%