2019 7th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/citsm47753.2019.8965407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Analysis of School Zoning System On Youtube Social Media Using The K-Nearest Neighbor With Levenshtein Distance Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, using word embedding combining with CNN achieve the accuracy of 76.2% [5], while use SVM with a classification accuracy of 84% [6], 79.412% [7] and 62.76% [8]. Model in our study also better than research that was using K-Nearest Neighbor and Levenshtein Distance (65,625%) [10], and using Naive Bayes (81%) [13]. Now, if we observed in Tables 3 and 4, using TF or TF-IDF as feature extraction does not show a significant difference in the accuracy results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, using word embedding combining with CNN achieve the accuracy of 76.2% [5], while use SVM with a classification accuracy of 84% [6], 79.412% [7] and 62.76% [8]. Model in our study also better than research that was using K-Nearest Neighbor and Levenshtein Distance (65,625%) [10], and using Naive Bayes (81%) [13]. Now, if we observed in Tables 3 and 4, using TF or TF-IDF as feature extraction does not show a significant difference in the accuracy results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Another study developed a combination of K-Nearest Neighbor and Levenshtein Distance. This combination only gets an accuracy of 65,625% [10]. Another study that combines several machine learning methods is the combination of the Naive Bayes and Decision Tree Classifier but does not report its accuracy [11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research shows the result of accuracy of 79.412% [9]. Other studies using SVM using the linear kernel function, show an accuracy of 62.76% [10], sentiment analysis using a combination of K-Nearest Neighbor and Levenshtein Distance, show the accuracy of 65.625% [11]. Other research on sentiment analysis uses Naive Bayes Classifier and Decision Tree Classifier and preprocessing using emoji deletion of punctuation removal, number correction of non-standard words, and POS-Tagging [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The KNN algorithm saves all existing data and classifies fresh data points according to their similarity. This implies that new data present can be quickly sorted into a well-suited category using the KNN algorithm as it arises [22]- [23]. The KNN algorithm is a non-parametric algorithm, which means it makes no assumptions about the data [24], [25].…”
Section: K-nearest Neighbors (Knn) Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%