2019 12th International Conference on Information &Amp; Communication Technology and System (ICTS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icts.2019.8850982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Analysis of Restaurant Customer Reviews on TripAdvisor using Naïve Bayes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this testing scenario, a meat classification trial was conducted using the Naïve Bayes method with 5 variations of meat with 3 different temperature variations. Naive Bayes calculates destiny possibility predictions from facts or studies that had been given, based at the opportunity point ofview [22]. In the testing of scenario 3, k-fold cross-validation was used, with k = 10 as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Scenario 3 Testing (Naïve Bayes Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this testing scenario, a meat classification trial was conducted using the Naïve Bayes method with 5 variations of meat with 3 different temperature variations. Naive Bayes calculates destiny possibility predictions from facts or studies that had been given, based at the opportunity point ofview [22]. In the testing of scenario 3, k-fold cross-validation was used, with k = 10 as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Scenario 3 Testing (Naïve Bayes Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-processing steps, which included removing URLs, numbers or stop-words, did not have any effect on the performance of the sentiment classifier. In addition, Sentiment Analysis on Twitter has also been applied to extract restaurant reviews from the Yelp 1 and TripAdvisor 2 datasets [22,23]. Sentiment analysis on social media may be used for novel applications such as analysing the effect of a celebrity's endorsement of products [24], identifying human trafficking [25], and education [26].…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results demonstrated a higher level of performance in comparison with the other sentiment analysis methods (Fikri and Sarno, (2019) that used SentiWordNet, a public dictionary and the support vector machine algorithm, as a complex machine-learning algorithm with a maximum accuracy of 76%). This provides explicit evidence of the better performance of our proposed bag-of-words selection process in comparison to the other sentiment analysis methods (see also the accuracy metrics of sentiment analysis models provided by Priyantina and Sarno (2019); Laksono et al (2019); Billyan et al (2019)).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussion Of The Findingsmentioning
confidence: 69%