2018
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i24/104299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Analysis for Odd-Even Scheme in Delhi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who did not receive free ration reported that they did not have a ration card, or their name was not included in the family’s ration card or were not present to provide a thumb impression to the biometric machine as they migrated to other states hinting at the non-portability of benefits. The data of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs indicated that the free ration scheme had failed because almost 11 states distributed less than 1% of food grains allocated to them (Sharma, 2020 ). Also, an RTI revealed that barely 10% of the Rs.…”
Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who did not receive free ration reported that they did not have a ration card, or their name was not included in the family’s ration card or were not present to provide a thumb impression to the biometric machine as they migrated to other states hinting at the non-portability of benefits. The data of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs indicated that the free ration scheme had failed because almost 11 states distributed less than 1% of food grains allocated to them (Sharma, 2020 ). Also, an RTI revealed that barely 10% of the Rs.…”
Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terdapat beberapa penelitian mengenai pengaruh kebijakan ganjil-genap, namun sebagian besar terkait dengan tingkat pencemaran udara, seperti pada [16], [20], [24], [32], [13], [8] untuk kasus di New Delhi, India; [34], [21], [44], [42] di Beijing, China; [10] di Mexico, dan [26] di Jakarta. Selain kualitas udara, beberapa hal yang dipengaruhi adanya kebijakan ganjil-genap juga diteliti, seperti analisis sentimen dan peran serta masyarakat terhadap kebijakan ganjil-genap di New Delhi, India [9], [31], dan di Jakarta [43]; tingkat kemacetan lalu lintas, tingkat pelayanan moda transportasi umum, pelayanan parkir dll seperti dalam [15], [17], [23], [21], [35], [12]; tingkat kebisingan sekitar [11], kebiasaan perjalanan [38], maupun aspek hukum yang mendasari pelaksanaan kebijakan dalam [28].…”
Section: Tinjauan Pustakaunclassified