2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.107959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment analysis and spam filtering using the YAC2 clustering algorithm with transferability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their findings LR outperforms other models in terms of accuracy (over 70%). Ghiassi, M., et al [17] have performed user opinion analysis on datasets from Starbucks, Verizon, and Southwest Airlines. They employ unsupervised learning classifiers such as Yet Another Clustering and KNN.…”
Section: Review Of Machine Learning Techniques In User Opinion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to their findings LR outperforms other models in terms of accuracy (over 70%). Ghiassi, M., et al [17] have performed user opinion analysis on datasets from Starbucks, Verizon, and Southwest Airlines. They employ unsupervised learning classifiers such as Yet Another Clustering and KNN.…”
Section: Review Of Machine Learning Techniques In User Opinion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision specifies the proportion of true COVID tweets from the total positive tweet samples in a dataset. It is calculated by equation(17) Recall specifies the proportion of true positive rate of COVID tweets samples. It is calculated by equation(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, text categorization tasks are usually based on large amounts of annotated data, no matter whether they are supervised learning or self-supervised learning methods. Ghiassi et al [ 18 ] present an integrated solution that combines a new clustering algorithm, with a domain transferrable feature engineering approach for Twitter sentiment analysis and spam filtering of YouTube comments. Kim et al [ 19 ] propose a question-answer method to automatically provide users with infrastructure damage information from textual data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies proposed some mechanisms for detecting spam reviews and for predicting and ranking helpful reviews [12,13] on various opinion websites. Research [14] on spam detection has incorporated the technique of natural language processing (NLP) to process reviews. Since it is difficult to perform sentiment analysis, it is difficult to distinguish between spam and genuine reviews through natural language processing, and the accuracy of spam detection is not as high as expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%