2021
DOI: 10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentence Repetition as a Clinical Marker of Developmental Language Disorder: Evidence From Arabic

Abstract: Purpose: Research on the typical and impaired grammatical acquisition of Arabic is limited. This study systematically examined the morphosyntactic abilities of Arabic-speaking children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD) using a novel sentence repetition task. The usefulness of the task as an indicator of DLD in Arabic was determined. Method: A LITMUS (Language Impairment Testing in Multilingual Settings) sentence repet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some papers showed that the area of weaknesses for children with DLD is Sentence repetition (e.g. Pham & Ebert, 2020;Vang Christensen, 2019;Taha et al, 2021); or Nonword and Real-word repetition (e.g., Dispaldro et al, 2013;Girbau & Schwartz, 2008). However, our results do not support the single-task approach.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…For example, some papers showed that the area of weaknesses for children with DLD is Sentence repetition (e.g. Pham & Ebert, 2020;Vang Christensen, 2019;Taha et al, 2021); or Nonword and Real-word repetition (e.g., Dispaldro et al, 2013;Girbau & Schwartz, 2008). However, our results do not support the single-task approach.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, their responses were characterized as deviating further from the target sentences than the responses of the TD children on all the measures studied; that is to say, as a group they made significantly more errors of all types than the TD group. This is not surprising, as previous studies on sentence repetition tasks have shown them to reveal a special weakness for children with DLD, and to have good diagnostic accuracy (Komeili et al, 2020;Marinis & Armon-Lotem, 2015;Riches et al, 2010;Taha et al, 2021). Our results suggest that sentence repetition could be a useful tool for identifying Norwegian-speaking children with DLD, and the current study provides some direction as to which grammatical structures may be the most effective in distinguishing between children with DLD and TD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…During a sentence repetition task, the child processes the target sentence and reconstructs his or her response using the grammar and vocabulary available to him or her (Potter & Lombardi, 1990;2002). In addition, children may also use their dialect as a filter through which they process and respond to such as task, and thus we decided to disregard dialectal variations as has been done in similar studies in other languages (Taha, Stojanovik & Pagnamenta, 2021).…”
Section: Analytical Approach Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when this analysis was rerun with just studies who used age-matched TD groups, this effect disappears, suggesting that there was a confounding effect of how TD children were matched. It can therefore be tentatively concluded that SR tasks reliably result in a difference in performance between DLD and TD groups across different languages (in monolingual children), even those with a vastly different morphosyntactic structure to English, such as Arabic (Alsiddiqi et al, 2021;Taha et al, 2021). This may be in part due to the standardising influence of COST Action IS0804…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%