1992
DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(92)90074-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentence comprehension in Parkinson's disease: The role of attention and memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
102
1
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
8
102
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other primary deficits in the understanding of the grammatical features of a sentence might as well contribute to comprehension deficits, these ones related to frontal dysfunction 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other primary deficits in the understanding of the grammatical features of a sentence might as well contribute to comprehension deficits, these ones related to frontal dysfunction 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three general cognitive processes have been implicated in syntactic comprehension of sentences: (1) regulation of attention, (2) working memory and (3) speed of information processing. Several authors investigated syntactic complexity (e.g., subject-object relative clauses) during sentence comprehension in basal ganglia patients (e.g., Grossman et al, 1991Grossman et al, , 1992Grossman et al, , 1993Lieberman et al, 1990Lieberman et al, , 1992Natsopoulos et al, 1993;Pickett et al, 1998). While Grossman et al (1993) initially argued that syntactic comprehension deficits result from attentional rather than syntactic deficits, Lieberman et al (1990; proposed that repeated errors on syntactically complex sentences cannot be attributed to an attention deficit, but to a working memory deficit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Ullman, Corkin, et al (1997) held the view that this system's function together with left frontal cortex is the procedural grammar, Grossman and colleagues (Grossman et al, 1991;Grossman, Carvell, Stern, Gollomp, & Hurtig, 1992) considered the system's major function to relate to attentional factors. Friederici et al (1999), in contrast, proposed a possible dissociation between the function of the subcortical structures (i.e., basal ganglia on the one hand and the cortical structures on the other, with the latter supporting procedural syntactic aspects in particular).…”
Section: Patients With Focal Basal Ganglia Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. Lieberman (2000) attributed this impairment to an inability to decode finer temporal suprasegmental structure in the auditory input. Those studies examining syntactic comprehension reported that PD patients consistently experience comprehension difficulties when faced with syntactically complex sentences (Grossman et al, 1991(Grossman et al, , 1992Natsopoulos et al, 1993). With respect to these patients' grammatical processing deficit, Grossman et al (1993) suggested that it depends on a deficient attentional system rather than the grammar as such.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%