2021
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1081-21.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory-Tactile Functional Mapping and Use-Associated Structural Variation of the Human Female Genital Representation Field

Abstract: The precise location of the human female genital representation field in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is controversial and its capacity for use-associated structural variation as a function of sexual behavior remains unknown. We used a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-compatible sensory-tactile stimulation paradigm to functionally map the location of the female genital representation field in 20 adult women. Neural response to tactile stimulation of the clitoral region (vs right hand) iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most unusually, we found a small bilateral superior central sulcus auditory area (low to high frequencies from anterior-lateral to posterior-medial) embedded within Brodmann area 3a/3b (3aud). It occupies about half of a small no-response gap in our somatomotor mapping data between the representation of the ‘hand’ (which includes the arm and stomach) and the ‘foot’ (which includes the thigh and leg) that likely corresponds to the representation of the genitalia ( Knop et al, 2021 ) and/or respiratory muscles ( McKay et al, 2003 ), both of which we did not specifically stimulate. Auditory responses in this region are not unprecedented (see Tierney et al, 2012 , their Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most unusually, we found a small bilateral superior central sulcus auditory area (low to high frequencies from anterior-lateral to posterior-medial) embedded within Brodmann area 3a/3b (3aud). It occupies about half of a small no-response gap in our somatomotor mapping data between the representation of the ‘hand’ (which includes the arm and stomach) and the ‘foot’ (which includes the thigh and leg) that likely corresponds to the representation of the genitalia ( Knop et al, 2021 ) and/or respiratory muscles ( McKay et al, 2003 ), both of which we did not specifically stimulate. Auditory responses in this region are not unprecedented (see Tierney et al, 2012 , their Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insula genital touch activation is intriguing in the light of discriminative vs. affective touch as it is to date unknown whether CT fibers can be found in the genitals (Georgiadis and Kringelbach, 2012 ). Interestingly a recent human fMRI study described that the somatosensory region representing the clitoris is larger in women who reported to have higher frequencies of sexual intercourse in the past year and during the onset of their sexual activity (Knop et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Neural Circuits For Audition and Somatosensation In The Cont...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other groups of maltreated individuals exposed to emotional abuse showed relative thinning in cortical regions relevant to self‐evaluation and self‐awareness (Heim et al., 2013). While these sensory adaptations may protect a child from fully processing frightening experiences, later they may lead to problems, such as impaired sexual response (Knop et al., 2022) when sensory awareness is needed.…”
Section: Altered Threat Detection and Responsementioning
confidence: 99%