2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2013.6630894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory substitution via cutaneous skin stretch feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constant k is thus referred to as "Weber's fraction". For example, Schorr et al [9] measured the ability of users to discriminate environment stiffness using varying levels of skin stretch at the finger pad. Results showed a mean Weber fractions of 0.168.…”
Section: Differential Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constant k is thus referred to as "Weber's fraction". For example, Schorr et al [9] measured the ability of users to discriminate environment stiffness using varying levels of skin stretch at the finger pad. Results showed a mean Weber fractions of 0.168.…”
Section: Differential Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, cutaneous haptic feedback provides an effective and elegant way to simplify the design of this type of haptic interfaces: skin receptors' very low activation thresholds [5], [6] enable researchers to design small, lightweight, and inexpensive cutaneous haptic interfaces [2], [7], [8]. Finally, cutaneous feedback has been also proven to play a key role in enhancing the performance and effectiveness of teleoperation and immersive systems [8], [9], [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Schorr et al [7], in order to evaluate the potential for skin stretch feedback to be used as a sensory substitute for kinesthetic feedback in robotic teleoperation systems, measured the ability of users to discriminate environment stiffness using varying levels of skin stretch at the finger pad. Results showed a mean Weber fractions of 0.168.…”
Section: B Differential Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, cutaneous feedback provides an effective and elegant way to simplify the design of this type of haptic interfaces: cutaneous receptors' very low activation thresholds [2] enable researchers to design small, lightweight and inexpensive cutaneous haptic interfaces [3], [4], [5]. Finally, cutaneous feedback has been also proven to play a key role in enhancing the performance and effectiveness of teleoperation and immersive systems [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be operated by motors [16], by dielectric elastomers [17], piezoelectrically [18] or pneumatically [19]. Nevertheless, there are also approaches for tactile feedback via shear forces (location-dependant friction [20] or mechanical skin stretch [21]). Feedback via vibration is already established in mobile devices with touch screens, but in the currently rather low stage of development this is not applicable for surgical input devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%