Handbook of Meat, Poultry and Seafood Quality 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118352434.ch30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Quality of Fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panelists were requested to identify, within each modality, all the descriptors useful for distinguishing amongst samples, each of which had been previously identified with three-digit random codes. Overall, 144 descriptors were generated according to Civille and Lyon (1996) and Hyldig (2012) an then they were reduced to 26 according to ISO (ISO 11035:1994). Supplementary Table 1-2 lists these descriptors together with definitions and selected references, as derived from the panel's work during three dedicated sessions.…”
Section: The Sensory Panel and Its Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Panelists were requested to identify, within each modality, all the descriptors useful for distinguishing amongst samples, each of which had been previously identified with three-digit random codes. Overall, 144 descriptors were generated according to Civille and Lyon (1996) and Hyldig (2012) an then they were reduced to 26 according to ISO (ISO 11035:1994). Supplementary Table 1-2 lists these descriptors together with definitions and selected references, as derived from the panel's work during three dedicated sessions.…”
Section: The Sensory Panel and Its Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taste on the tongue stimulated by solutions of caffeine, quinine, and certain other alkaloids (Civille and Lyon, 1996) No stimulus A 0.03 % solution of caffeine in water (Jellinek, 1985) Umami_T Specific chemical feeling factor stimulated by monosodium glutamate (MSG) and certain other nucleotides (Civille and Lyon, 1996) No stimulus A 0.15 % solution of MGS in water (Jellinek, 1985) 1 A 12-cm unstructured line scale was adopted, anchored respectively at 1.0 and 11.0 cm from the beginning of the scale itself (Stone et al, 1980). 2 Here and whenever serving temperature is mentioned, 45-50°C was selected for both fish samples and reference materials (Hyldig, 2012). A: appearance; O: odor; T: taste.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensory evaluation is a scientific discipline for the purposes of evaluating consumer products (Hyldig, 2012;Vidal et al, 2020). Nowadays, sensory analysis has been a useful tool to evaluate the changes of raw meat quality during storage (Paglarini et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Effect Of Super-chilled Storage On Sensory Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%