2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory quality control for food certification: A case study on wine. Panel training and qualification, method validation and monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trained panel proved accurate in differentiating samples with the rancid flavor defect according to the combined methods applied. In another study Etaio et al(2010) started a selection for a wine trained panel with 31 assessors, finishing with 13 in the training, ending with seven experts as in the present study, but using only percentages of success; no ANOVA was applied. This proves the difficulty in obtaining a large number of expert assessors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The trained panel proved accurate in differentiating samples with the rancid flavor defect according to the combined methods applied. In another study Etaio et al(2010) started a selection for a wine trained panel with 31 assessors, finishing with 13 in the training, ending with seven experts as in the present study, but using only percentages of success; no ANOVA was applied. This proves the difficulty in obtaining a large number of expert assessors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, consumer preferences, acceptance and feedback are very important to the market (Ares et al, 2015), which demonstrates the importance of sensory analysis in many areas, from the development of products to quality control (Ares et al, 2015;Latreille et al, 2006). Therefore, selection and training are required to assess reliable measurements from individual reactions (Latreille et al, 2006;Etaio et al, 2010). To accredit a trained panel, the assessors must present repeatability (consensus), reproducibility, discrimination ability; and they must be able to notice differences that might seem small to consumers, with all technical competence acquired remaining over time (Etaio et al, 2010;González et al, 2007;López-Aguilar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations