1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb02974.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Properties of Rib and Round Muscle Roasts from Two Beef Breed‐Types on Two Feeding Regimes

Abstract: Roasts from the rib and three round muscles obtained from Angus and Simmental X Angus (SA) steers on two feeding regimes, high concentrate (HC) and pasture followed by short term HC, were roasted to an internal temperature of 65-68°C. Time of roasting, cooking losses, shear values, and pressed juice were determined. A trained sensory panel evaluated flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall acceptability. Sensory panelists scored flavor acceptability higher in SA roasts (P < 0.05) than in roasts from Angus st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…barley-fed steers were noted to possess livery, bloody, and metallic aftertastes than steaks from corn-fed cattle. In contrast, others (McCurdy et al, 1981;Miller et al, 1996) failed to detect differences among barley-and corn-finished beef.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…barley-fed steers were noted to possess livery, bloody, and metallic aftertastes than steaks from corn-fed cattle. In contrast, others (McCurdy et al, 1981;Miller et al, 1996) failed to detect differences among barley-and corn-finished beef.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…No significant differences in aroma or flavor scores as a function of animal feed were noted. The majority of investigators including Brown et al (1979) and McCurdy et al (1981) found that trained taste panelists scored pasture-fed beef significantly lower in flavor than grain-fed beef. Reagan et al (1981), however, reported nonsignificant differences in panel scores due to animal diet.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Panel Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%