1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.1999.tb00119.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Profiling and Positioning of Commercial Samples of Milk Powder

Abstract: Milk powders available commercially are of different qualities. The quality deviations may be due to inherent quality of the milk which in turn is dependent on various conditions like the fat content, the processing parameters, the storage time and the packaging materials used. The various brands of milk powders have been profiled sensorily for odor and flavor and also positioned using Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA). The study throws light on the relative qualities of the different brands, their positiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For aroma and flavor evaluation, 10 g of whey powder and 0.01 mL of color (McCormick red food color to prevent the appearance of whey from influencing a panelist's decision) were suspended in 100 mL of spring water at 40°C and mixed by electric mixer at 200 rpm for 2 min. Samples (70 mL) were served in clear wine glasses covered with plastic lids, and were evaluated at 25 ± 2°C after standing for 2 h (Kamath et al, 1999) to allow for release of volatile aroma into the head space. After evaluation of aroma, flavor was evaluated.…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For aroma and flavor evaluation, 10 g of whey powder and 0.01 mL of color (McCormick red food color to prevent the appearance of whey from influencing a panelist's decision) were suspended in 100 mL of spring water at 40°C and mixed by electric mixer at 200 rpm for 2 min. Samples (70 mL) were served in clear wine glasses covered with plastic lids, and were evaluated at 25 ± 2°C after standing for 2 h (Kamath et al, 1999) to allow for release of volatile aroma into the head space. After evaluation of aroma, flavor was evaluated.…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory evaluation of milk powder with microencapsulated OPO was followed as per the recommendations of the International Dairy Federation (IDF) [14] with some modifications. [15,16] Thirty assessors were used for sensory evaluation of milk powder samples. A 0-to 10-point scale was used for four sensory attributes (overall impression, frankincense, colour, and reconstituability) with 0 being unacceptable and 10 being excellent; ≥5 indicated an acceptable sample.…”
Section: Preparation Of Microencapsulated Opomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have determined sensory properties of various milk samples including plain milk (Claassen and Lawless 1992;Frost et al 2001;Francis et al 2005), chocolate milk (Thompson et al 2004), powdered milk (Kamath et al 1999;Drake et al 2003) and processed milks that are not specific to UHT milk (Chapman et al 2001;Fromm and Boor 2004;Clare et al 2005). In addition, lexicons for milk alternatives such as soymilk, have been published (Torres-Penaranda and Reitmeier 2001;Day N' Kouka et al 2004;Chambers et al 2006;Keast and Lau 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%