1989
DOI: 10.7210/jrsj.7.6_647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory feedback control for space manipulators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this was only an analytical factor to characterize the coupling rather than having any application for control purposes. The generalized Jacobian comprises the conventional Jacobian of computational complexity OðnÞ with additional terms dependent on the masses, inertias and geometric structures of each link which generate the additional complexity [39]. The conventional Jacobian could be used to derive a transposed Jacobian which yielded satisfactory results when the platform-manipulator mass ratios were in excess of *5.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Space-based Manipulator Kinematimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this was only an analytical factor to characterize the coupling rather than having any application for control purposes. The generalized Jacobian comprises the conventional Jacobian of computational complexity OðnÞ with additional terms dependent on the masses, inertias and geometric structures of each link which generate the additional complexity [39]. The conventional Jacobian could be used to derive a transposed Jacobian which yielded satisfactory results when the platform-manipulator mass ratios were in excess of *5.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Space-based Manipulator Kinematimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such freefloating systems are defined by their lack of a dedicated spacecraft attitude control system. The generalized Jacobian, owing to its dynamic nature, is complex to compute with a complexity of Oðn 2 Þ and so not conducive to real-time operation onboard spacerated processors [39]. A dynamic coupling coefficient may be defined to quantify the relation between the endeffector velocity and base velocity [40] …”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Space-based Manipulator Kinematimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be inferred from the leading superscript, all these quantities are defined w.r.t. the base frame {b} (see also Masutani et al, 1989). We should note that the coupling inertia submatrix M vm , contributing to translational motion of the CRB, is identical to the system CoM Jacobian, up to a multiplicative constant (the total mass).…”
Section: Momentum-based Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant research has been carried out to address the above control objectives. Representative works in the field of freefloating space robots are Masutani et al (1989); Papadopoulos and Dubowsky (1991); Torres and Dubowsky (1992). Inertial damping has been exploited to deal with vibration suppression of flexible-base robots (Lee and Book, 1990;Hanson and Tolson, 1995;Torres et al, 1996) and with so-called macro-micro manipulator systems (Book and Lee, 1989;Yoshikawa et al, 1993;Sharf, 1996;Parsa et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper deals with the relative rigid body motion control of a moving target object with respect to the camera frame. This control problem is standard and important, and has gained much attention of researchers for many years [3][4][5][6][7]. The control objective is to track the moving target object in a threedimensional workspace by image information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%