2004
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000106939.41855.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork

Abstract: Quantitative vibratory evaluation with Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork is rapid, has high inter- and intrarater reliability, and provides measures for evaluating changes in sensory function over time. Examinations with the quantitative tuning fork are also more sensitive and specific than qualitative vibration testing for detecting changes in sensory nerve function. Use of the quantitative tuning fork takes no more time, provides more objective information, and should replace the qualitative vibratory testing method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ability to feel 0-131 microns). Some tuning forks can provide a quantitative measure of vibration threshold that has been shown to correlate with the SNAP amplitude [23]. Work by Oyer and colleagues suggests that categorizing tuning fork thresholds as 10 seconds or less can detect significant impairment in diabetic adults (ages of participants not reported) who exhibit normal 10-g monofilament detection [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ability to feel 0-131 microns). Some tuning forks can provide a quantitative measure of vibration threshold that has been shown to correlate with the SNAP amplitude [23]. Work by Oyer and colleagues suggests that categorizing tuning fork thresholds as 10 seconds or less can detect significant impairment in diabetic adults (ages of participants not reported) who exhibit normal 10-g monofilament detection [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibration is increased until the participant reports feeling it. Another method is a quantitative tuning fork, which involves adjusting calibrated weights on the two arms of the fork, to change the vibration from a scale of 0 to 8 [23]. With this method, the participant reports when they no longer feel the vibration.…”
Section: Vibration Detection Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides personal characteristics, information about the cause, location and severity of the SCI lesion was provided. Sensory vibration threshold was tested using a ReidelSeiffer tuning fork [11,12]. Strength of the foot dorsal flexors was tested using a torque measurement device (see Methods), while walking capacity was tested using 10 m walk tests [13] at preferred and maximum speed, as well as the revised version of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II; [14]).…”
Section: Methods J Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all oncologists are comfortable with neuroexamination. Clinical examination is rapid, cheap, reproducible, easy to learn and predictive of neurophysiological alterations [15][16][17].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%