2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory evoked potentials in patients with Rett syndrome through the lens of animal studies: Systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 1/f slope of EEG spectrum or slowing of mu-rhythm. Event-related potential characteristics are also among promising biomarkers for RTT (see review [ 40 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, 1/f slope of EEG spectrum or slowing of mu-rhythm. Event-related potential characteristics are also among promising biomarkers for RTT (see review [ 40 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional 7 studies were added that did not come up on the search but were identified in reading the identified literature. Abstract-based screening identified 105 studies reporting EEG characteristics/epilepsy in RTT, including 21 reviews: one review was related to systematic review of event-related potentials in Rett syndrome [ 40 ] that is out of scope of the current review; and most others ( n = 11) focused on epileptiform discharges and seizures in patients with RTT [ 41 , 46 , 54 , 58 , 223 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 ]. One review was devoted to findings in RTT animal models [ 205 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research at the preclinical level has reported similar abnormalities in the VEP and AEP in animal models of the condition 12,25–28 and has identified potential mechanisms underlying the attenuation of the responses for reviews, see refs. 29 and 30. The translatable value of these measures further points to their potential utility in clinical trials for RTT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As appealing as ABRs are as a non-invasive measure of function in lower auditory structures, too few studies have performed this test on rodent models of ASD to draw conclusions across different models. ABR measures in children with autism show trends towards lower amplitudes and longer latencies, but there is a significant variation in the response [ 74 , 76 , 136 ]. The inability of rodent studies in various models to converge on a consistent ABR phenotype may therefore be an accurate portrayal of the diversity of ABRs in iASD with a range of aetiologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%