2001
DOI: 10.1006/appe.2000.0368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory, digestive and metabolic influences on preference and intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If infants ate until meeting their energy needs, one may wonder why infants in the 2 other groups did not eat more. In these groups, ingested volume (37)(38)(39) and sensory-specific satiation (40)(41)(42) may explain meal termination. The third hypothesis is that the lower intake in the FNL group may be related to expected satiation, which is described as the extent to which a food is expected to deliver fullness (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If infants ate until meeting their energy needs, one may wonder why infants in the 2 other groups did not eat more. In these groups, ingested volume (37)(38)(39) and sensory-specific satiation (40)(41)(42) may explain meal termination. The third hypothesis is that the lower intake in the FNL group may be related to expected satiation, which is described as the extent to which a food is expected to deliver fullness (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%