2021
DOI: 10.26855/ijfsa.2021.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory and Instrumental Methods of Meat Evaluation: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global consumers have a persistent need for the reliable and uninterrupted provision of high-quality food products that align with the perceived value corresponding to their cost. Objective tests are employed for the purpose of assessing a specific attribute of a food product, rather than evaluating its overall quality [58].…”
Section: Meat Analysis and Health Lipid Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global consumers have a persistent need for the reliable and uninterrupted provision of high-quality food products that align with the perceived value corresponding to their cost. Objective tests are employed for the purpose of assessing a specific attribute of a food product, rather than evaluating its overall quality [58].…”
Section: Meat Analysis and Health Lipid Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous reviews have summarized the use and applications of electronic devices mimicking human senses in fresh meat or covering a specific device [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], a review about the key aspects covering both fresh meat and meat products with information about each current technology in this field is still needed. Therefore, this review aims to synthesize the information about the fundamentals of E-nose, E-eye, and E-tongue, data preprocessing, key chemometric methods (to manage and obtain key information), the wide range of applications to evaluate both fresh meat and meat products, relevant advantages and disadvantages to devices, and recommendations for further studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%