Warmed-Over Flavor of Meat 1987
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-661605-7.50009-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Analysis of Undesirable Flavors in Meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Training was conducted in ten 30 min sessions over a 2 wk period using a group discussion format. WOA was described using known quality descriptors summarized by Melton et al (1987) and additional terms generated by the panel. Trainees rated WOA intensity in cooked GP stored for 2, 4, 8, and 12 days against a freshly cooked reference (labeled "R") using a g-point scale (O=weak; S=strong).…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training was conducted in ten 30 min sessions over a 2 wk period using a group discussion format. WOA was described using known quality descriptors summarized by Melton et al (1987) and additional terms generated by the panel. Trainees rated WOA intensity in cooked GP stored for 2, 4, 8, and 12 days against a freshly cooked reference (labeled "R") using a g-point scale (O=weak; S=strong).…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessors were not informed of the purpose of the study. The chosen attributes were recalled from bibliography and discussed with the assessors during the training session (Risvik 1985;Melton 1987). The test was performed during two days.…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Powers (1984), there are no guidelines as to just how effective a panelist needs to be in order to be accepted or retrained; consequently, the minimum level of performance required needs to be varied according to the product and the purpose of the task. In this work, the panelists' ability to discriminate between samples (sample factor) and to reproduce this (session factor) were analyzed by applying analyses of variance for each attribute and panelist to assess the suitability of the training process (Cross et al 1978;Melton et al 1987). Five meat samples, with different qualities of aroma, flavor and texture, were used for performance evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%